OSCE expands access to its technical guidance on the physical security of critical infrastructure

The OSCE Centre in Ashgabat and the OSCE Transnational Threats Department launched the Turkmen version of their Technical Guide on Physical Security Considerations for Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Terrorist Attacks. The launch event was accompanied by a training course on enhancing the physical security of critical infrastructure from terrorist attacks, using the Technical Guide as a training aid.
Developed under the OSCE’s Project PROTECT with support from Germany and the United States of America, the Technical Guide provides practical guidance to policymakers, critical infrastructure owners and operators, and security practitioners on enhancing the protection of critical infrastructure sites from terrorist attacks. The publication consolidates publicly available practices and examples from across the OSCE area and is designed to support stakeholders in developing security measures tailored to their specific risk environment. It was released in November 2025 in the English and Russian. The launch of the Turkmen language version of this Guide, initiated by the OSCE Centre in Ashgabat, is a testament to the Guide's growing value in OSCE participating States.
A representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Turkmenistan presented the country's approach to protecting critical infrastructure, highlighting current practices, the national legislative framework and ongoing efforts to strengthen the security and resilience of critical infrastructure.
The training course brought together government officials responsible for critical infrastructure protection to strengthen their understanding of physical security principles and practices. Participants examined approaches to security system design as well as technical measures including perimeter protection, intrusion detection systems, security lighting, video surveillance, access control and security screening. During the event, participants explored practical ways to apply the Guide’s principles through security assessments, emergency planning, business continuity measures and training exercises.
“The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe serves as a vital pillar in global counter-terrorism efforts by actively strengthening the resilience and protection of critical infrastructure across its 57 participating States. Bearing in mind that security is not a task for a single agency or nation, we designed this training programme to build our collective resilience. It is our firm belief that this programme, together with the Guide, will strengthen inter-agency communication and help upgrade security protocols to more effectively protect critical infrastructure from terrorist attacks,” said William Leaf, Head of the OSCE Centre in Ashgabat.
The event featured contributions from international experts and practitioners, as well as the Government of Kazakhstan, another key stakeholder in the OSCE’s Project PROTECT. A representative of the Anti-Terrorism Centre of the Committee of National Security of the Republic of Kazakhstan delivered a presentation on the country's approach to protecting critical infrastructure from terrorist threats.
The event forms part of the OSCE Centre in Ashgabat's project Building Capacity of Law Enforcement and Security Officials of Turkmenistan in Countering Transnational Threats Related to Organized Crime and Terrorism – 2026 and the OSCE's extrabudgetary Project PROTECT, which supports participating States in strengthening national approaches to protecting vulnerable targets from terrorist threats and other hazards.

CoESS calls for exclusion of Private Security Services from EU Inc. Regulation

The Confederation of European Security Services (CoESS) has published a new position paper raising concerns about the European Commission’s proposal for an EU Inc. Regulation. While the proposal aims to simplify cross-border company operations in the EU, CoESS warns that it could unintentionally weaken national security frameworks and create loopholes in the regulation of private security services.
According to CoESS, private security services are already excluded from the EU Services Directive due to their direct link to internal security, Critical Infrastructure Protection, and support for law enforcement and emergency services. The organisation argues that the proposed EU Inc. framework — with rapid digital incorporation, EU-wide company recognition, and limits on additional national requirements — could make it easier for companies to circumvent national licensing and supervision systems. This would create enforcement challenges for national authorities and increase risks related to unlawful competition and weaker oversight.
The paper highlights that private security regulation differs significantly between Member States, reflecting national public security needs and operational realities. CoESS therefore believes that Member States must retain full control over authorising and supervising companies operating in this sensitive sector. The organisation also warns that the proposal could indirectly undermine the exclusion of private security services from the EU Services Directive by facilitating cross-border operations outside national regulatory frameworks.
CoESS is therefore calling on EU policymakers to explicitly exclude private security services from the scope of the future EU Inc. Regulation. The organisation stresses that such an exclusion is necessary to preserve effective enforcement of national security law and maintain robust supervision of services linked to public safety and Critical Infrastructure Protection.

JRC identifies key opportunities for critical raw material recovery

Waste from different sources, including batteries, vehicles and electrical equipment, has great potential for the recovery and recycling of critical raw materials, a new JRC report shows.
Critical raw materials are essential elements of key technologies, from electric vehicles and wind turbines, to drones and smartphones. Currently, the EU is highly dependent on third countries for their supply. As the demand for such technologies is expected to surge, this will put immense pressure on securing access to critical raw materials.
By improving waste collection and processing, the EU can recover strategic raw materials domestically. The production of secondary strategic and critical raw materials, as well as extending the lifetime of products, can reduce dependency on third countries and support the transition to a more circular economy.
A new JRC report identifies a list of products, components and waste streams that could have a significant circularity potential for critical and strategic raw materials, such as permanent magnets from wind turbines, cobalt and lithium in electric vehicle batteries, and aluminium parts in vehicles.
The list, a step forward under the Critical Raw Materials Act, will help EU countries prioritise key waste streams for recoverability and help identify gaps in current waste treatment systems. It also highlights challenges and opportunities for a more circular and strategically independent raw materials’ value chain.
From waste to resource
The analysis highlights current gaps in treatment of waste from specific products. For example, small electrical and electronic equipment account for significant losses of strategic and critical raw materials: 46% of the total strategic and critical raw materials in these products is lost in collection. Yet, common household items, such as hard disk drives and cables could have a significant recovery potential, if well-collected and treated.
Moreover, the report shows that critical raw materials used in electric vehicle batteries and wind turbines - the very technologies which power the shift to cleaner energy - are often not sufficiently recovered, leading to a major loss of critical raw materials when these products reach the end of their life.
Similarly, permanent magnets used in wind turbines tend to get lost in bulk steel and aluminium waste flows, rather than being recovered separately, despite their strategic importance. Losses are projected to jump from 1.9 thousand tonnes per year in 2022 to around 45 thousand tonnes per year in 2030, when the first large wave of turbines reaches their end-of-life.
Towards a more circular economy 
The Critical Raw Materials Act requires EU countries to develop national circularity programmes that target specific waste streams. This report supports the Implementing Act of Article 26 of the Critical Raw Materials Act, and helps governments put in place effective programmes by making it easier to spot gaps in existing legislation, processes and data, and to harness circularity potential.
By keeping critical and strategic materials within the continent, the EU can improve the circular economy and EU competitiveness, while reducing exposure to supply disruptions.

NIS360: The bigger picture on maturity and criticality of NIS critical sectors

This year’s edition of the ENISA NIS360 report shows improvement in cybersecurity maturity of EU critical sectors while the level of criticality in sectors remains comparatively more stable.
The ENISA NIS360 aims to work as an annual assessment tool supporting national authorities, policymakers and other stakeholders in assessing the cybersecurity maturity and criticality of high criticality sectors under the NIS2 Directive.
ENISA Executive Director, Juhan Lepassaar, said: “The findings of this NIS360 report provide grounds to be optimistic. The implementation of the comprehensive EU cybersecurity regulatory framework, and particularly NIS2, has brought significant improvements. ENISA stands for prioritising cybersecurity and advancing the implementation of EU policies, which are vital now more than ever, to enhance the cyber resilience of our critical infrastructure and societies.”.
The report has a comprehensive approach, where each sector is understood to comprise relevant actors (i.e., national authorities, entities, EU bodies) and applicable rules (EU legislation). In this regard, a sector’s maturity under the NIS360 is determined by: legislation and its effectiveness, companies and their preparedness, authorities and their institutional capacity, and sectoral ecosystem structures and their effectiveness.
The assessment relies on a structured methodology developed and continuously refined by ENISA that takes into account the structural and gradually evolving nature of sectoral cybersecurity maturity and criticality. It also builds on evidence gathered over time from organisations operating within the in-scope sectors, national authorities supervising those organisations, but also EU-level data, to reflect our latest evidence-informed understanding of where each sector stands.
As a result, the NIS360 provides both a comparative overview of sectors and a more detailed analysis per sector to help identify gaps and prioritise resources.
Defining the Risk Zone
NIS360 sector risk zone
A combination and joint interpretation of the criticality and maturity dimensions helps identify areas where mismatches exist between the two and define a risk zone.
The risk zone includes sectors with lower-than-average maturity and criticality that exceeds their maturity. This year’s risk zone includes health, railway, maritime, ICT management service, space, public administrations, drinking and waste water.
Its composition changes over time as overall maturity improves across sectors. This explains why three sectors — railway, drinking water, and waste water — previously at the risk zone boundary, are now within the risk zone. A positive development is that the gas sector has started moving out of the risk zone.
Such shift is driven by improved information sharing, stronger collaboration, and better implementation of risk management measures, leading to higher maturity.
Deep-dive on criticality
While criticality of the sectors is defined by NIS2, the NIS360 assessment ranks the sectors taking into account several elements, such as systemic relevance, exposure, and impact of disruption. As these factors typically change gradually, criticality scores tend to remain relatively stable from year to year.
In this year’s edition, sectors such as banking, electricity, aviation, space, and digital-by-default services (including telecommunications, cloud, and data centres) remain the most critical.
Space has joined this group this year, reflecting its growing role in society and across other sectors, which increases dependency, impact, and time criticality. The railway sector increased in criticality due to its growing role in military logistics, and the heightened cyber threat exposure.
Spotlight on maturity 
Maturity is measured by how effectively and consistently the sector manages cybersecurity risks and capabilities over time, meaning the overall preparedness of the sector. Since the previous edition of this report, cybersecurity maturity across EU critical sectors seems to be steadily improving as organisations respond to the evolving policy requirements and to the cyber threats they face.
Three sectors, including trust services, aviation, and financial market infrastructures (FMIs) moved into the high maturity band. In addition, four sectors strengthened their maturity within the moderate band: gas, road, maritime, and health.
This improvement is often driven by several compounding factors including developments in cybersecurity legislation, increased political attention, but also progress across specific maturity dimensions assessed. Particularly, on cybersecurity legislation, findings of the 2025 ENISA NIS Investments study also suggest that it has acted as a key driver for cybersecurity investment and has encouraged organisations to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.
Despite maturity steadily improving across critical sectors, progress still remains uneven both across and within sectors. A number of factors contribute to these variations including skill shortages, sector-specific characteristics and even organisational size.
Moving forward
In the future, it is anticipated that cybersecurity legislation and organisations’ efforts to strengthen their cybersecurity maturity will continue to prompt cybersecurity investment and drive preparedness, leading to more sectors moving out of the risk zone.

Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience Europe announces Preliminary Conference Programme

The 10th Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience Europe, taking place in Brindisi, Italy on 14th-16th October, has announced its Preliminary Conference Programme, with a fantastic line up of international expert speakers sharing their thoughts, experiences and expertise at this premier conference.
Download your guide at www.cipre-expo.com/guide
The second ‘Critical Infrastructure Protection Week in Europe’ will take place in Italy, Brindisi and will see the International Association for CIP Professionals (IACIPP) host the ‘Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience Europe’ conference and exhibition and ‘The International Emergency Management Society (TIEMS)’ conference as the two key events as part of the initiative.
Download your preliminary conference guide now
The Preliminary Conference Programme guide provides you with the latest conference agenda, speakers and information to plan your attendance to the premier conference for the critical infrastructure protection, civil contingencies and safer cities professionals.
Download your guide at www.cipre-expo.com/guide
Register online today at: https://www.cipre-expo.com/buy-tickets/
#criticalinfrastructure #criticalinfrastructureprotection #cybersecurity #resilience #emergencymanagement #transport #energy #communications #security #criticalassets #criticalcommunications #firstresponders #nis2 #cerdirective #uas #drones #riskmanagement #riskmitigation

From heatwaves to cyber threats: a comprehensive new guide to today’s hazards

The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and the International Science Council (ISC) have released an updated edition of their comprehensive hazard guide, offering clear, standardized information on 282 hazards - from wildfires and earthquakes to cyberattacks and pandemics.
The new edition reflects the complex and interconnected nature of today's global risk landscape. Hazards increasingly occur together, cascade across systems, and amplify one another. In response, the updated profiles emphasize a multi-hazard approach-critical for effective early warning systems, emergency planning, and disaster resilience. Originally launched in 2021 as the first resource of its kind, the hazard definitions and classification provide an authoritative technical foundation for disaster risk reduction efforts worldwide. This updated edition builds on that foundation with:
- 282 reviewed hazards across 8 types and 39 clusters
- Improved, machine-readable format to support their use across digital tools and systems. E.g. the updated hazard taxonomy with standard definitions enables the new generation UNDRR-UNDP-WMO disaster tracking system.
- Clearer articulation of hazard interactions and multi-hazard scenarios
- User-informed revisions and new content to support real-world planning and response
"From local governments to humanitarian agencies, the need for consistent, science-based hazard information is universal. These profiles reflect the best available scientific understanding of hazards and offer a foundation for evidence-based policies that reduce risk and build resilience," said Salvatore Aricò, CEO, International Science Council.
"Reliable and standardized hazard data are essential for informing disaster risk reduction strategies. This update helps countries implement the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction to reduce losses by 2030," said Kamal Kishore, the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction.
"This updated edition reflects what we've learned: hazards are not standalone events. They are part of a complex web of risk. By bringing together diverse expert and user input, we've made these profiles more actionable, more interconnected, and more immediately useful," said Professor Virginia Murray, Chair of the Hazard Information Profiles Steering Group.
The revision process engaged over 270 experts, reviewers, and users from across sectors and regions. A dedicated User Group, Multi-Hazard Group, and Machine Actionability Group ensured the profiles remain practical, future-ready, and inclusive of diverse perspectives and needs.
Since the initial release, the hazard profiles have been widely used by national disaster management agencies, UN bodies, researchers, and humanitarian organizations for planning, monitoring, risk assessments, and training. This success has prompted the current update to ensure that they remain relevant and up to date.

The latest issue of Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News has arrived

Download your copy now at www.cip-association.org/CIPRNews
Please find here your downloadable copy of the Winter 2024-25 issue of Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News, the official magazine of the International Association of CIP Professionals (IACIPP), for the latest views, features and news, including a Preview of the upcoming Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience North America conference, taking place in Houston, TX on March 11th-13th, and co-hosted by InfraGard Houston.
Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News in this issue:
- Are we getting the deserved return-on-investment from the EU research on critical infrastructure resilience?
- Reducing disaster risks to deliver a resilient future
- New report: Terrorists exploiting global tensions
- The future of risk communications is community engagement
- Navigating cybersecurity investments in the time of NIS 2
- Improving Red Teaming for Critical Infrastructure Protection: A Comprehensive Approach
- Artificial Intelligence Perspective: The Changing of the Guard
- Shaping the Future of AI in Security: CoESS Launches Ethical and Responsible AI Charter
- Preview of Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience North America
- Infragard Building Cross-sector Collaboration for Enhancing Resilience
- Counter-Drone Technology for Critical Infrastructure: Your Layered Security Stack is the Sum of Its Parts
- Harnessing AI to Secure America’s Rural Critical Infrastructure
- Ensuring Compliance with the EU CER Directive: Protecting Critical Fiber Optic Infrastructure
- An Interview with 3B Protection
- The evolution of underwater threats
- An Interview with SimSpace
- Agency News
- Industry News
Download your copy at www.cip-association.org/CIPRNews
#criticalinfrastructureprotection #criticalinfrastructure #resilience #cybersecurity #emergencymanagement #riskmitigation #portsecurity #homelandsecurity #firstresponder #riskmanagement #ai #artificalintelligence #energysecurity #gridresilience

CISA Launches FY2025-2026 International Strategic Plan

The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) published their 2025-2026 International Strategic Plan with a commitment to reducing risk to the globally interconnected and interdependent cyber and physical infrastructure.
In today’s interdependent and interconnected world, the protection and security of our cyber and physical infrastructure requires the concerted efforts of public and private partners around the globe. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is a globally recognized leader in shaping and implementing proactive approaches to reduce risk and increase the resilience of critical infrastructure on which the United States (U.S.) and its partners depend.
To effectively marshal its resources and guide operations, CISA issued the 2023-2025 CISA Strategic Plan, the agency’s first comprehensive strategic plan since CISA’s establishment in 2018. In recognition of the reality that today’s threats do not respect borders, CISA developed this CISA International Strategic Plan as a complementary guide for CISA’s international activities and outcomes.
This CISA International Strategic Plan acknowledges that the risks we face are complex and geographically dispersed, and that we cannot achieve our objectives in a vacuum. It is imperative that we expand visibility into internationally shared systemic risks. The maturity and security practices of global owners and operators of both cyber and physical infrastructure, technology, supply chains, and systems vary widely. Sharing timely, relevant, and accurate threat information and risk reduction advice with international partners provides the foundation for a more secure cyber-physical environment for all of us.
The CISA International Strategic Plan goals are to:
1. Bolster the Resilience of Foreign Infrastructure on Which the U.S. Depends.
2. Strengthen Integrated Cyber Defense.
3. Unify Agency Coordination of International Activities.
Through the goals and objectives outlined in this CISA International Strategic Plan – in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of State, and partners across the interagency, and in accordance with U.S. national security, economic, and foreign policy priorities – CISA will assess and prioritize critical infrastructure dependencies and partner with foreign entities to advance CISA’s homeland security mission.
Strategic Intent
The CISA International Strategic Plan will focus and guide the agency’s international efforts over the 2025–2026 period. It highlights the agency’s commitment to reducing risk to the globally interconnected and interdependent cyber and physical infrastructure that Americans rely on every day. Our aim is to shape the international environment to reduce risk to critical dependencies and set conditions for success in cooperation, competition, and conflict. The CISA International Strategic Plan lays out three goals CISA must achieve to address the ever-changing and dynamic challenges facing America and our international partners. The first two goals focus on “what” the agency will work on in the international environment to achieve our “why” – 1) to reduce risk to and build resilience of foreign assets, systems, and networks that impact U.S. critical infrastructure, 2) understand shared global threats to critical infrastructure, and 3) support collective defense. The third goal focuses internally to promote unified action, working as One CISA to conduct international activities.
Strategic Approach
The approach laid out in this CISA International Strategic Plan aligns with guidance set forth in the National Security Strategy, National Cybersecurity Strategy, U.S. International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy, CISA Strategic Plan 2023–2025, CISA Stakeholder Engagement Strategic Plan FY2023-2025, and CISA Cybersecurity Strategic Plan 2024–2026, as well as the identified priorities of the Secretary of Homeland Security. The CISA International Strategic Plan and the U.S. International Cyberspace and Digital Policy Strategy firmly align to bolster and broaden international alliances to mature cyber defense efforts, both domestically and internationally. This involves fostering collaborative relationships with global partners; sharing expertise, technical resources, and best practices; and collectively fortifying cyber resilience to address emerging threats in an interconnected world. Our strategic approach will not only advance the resilience of critical infrastructure dependencies at home and abroad, but it will also ensure a long-term commitment in strengthening international partnerships that are essential for CISA’s mission success. As part of coordinated U.S. government efforts, CISA will proactively engage and support international partners to assess, influence, and assist with reducing risk and strengthen the security and resilience of foreign assets, systems, and networks on which our nation’s critical infrastructure depends. As threats evolve across the spectrum of competition with state and non-state actors, no single organization or entity has all the answers for how to address cyber and physical threats to critical infrastructure. Therefore, CISA will prioritize operational collaboration and international activities to achieve mutual interests and goals with our partners. This plan centralizes CISA’s focus and coordination on goals and objectives that increase homeland and national security. More importantly, it positions CISA to support the internal coordination of international activities through the execution of annual planning cycles. This CISA International Strategic Plan seeks to streamline or eliminate overlapping and redundant systems to synchronize complex international issues that cut across our agency.
Overall, our aim is to build, strengthen, and sustain international relationships to:
1. Advance homeland and national security objectives.
2. Prevent incidents and increase resilience of physical and cyber critical infrastructure at home and abroad.
3. Increase awareness to detect, deter, and disrupt emerging threats and hazards.
4. Manage and reduce systemic risks.
5. Increase understanding of international critical infrastructure interdependencies and anticipate cascading impacts.
6. Influence international policy, standards, and best practices.
7. Assist key partners to address their capability shortfalls.
8. Expand bilateral/multilateral exchanges of expertise, in tandem with increased federal inter- and intra-agency coordination, to improve risk management and incident response capacity.
9. Mature and strengthen CISA’s international partnerships, arrangements, and policies.
Goal 1: Bolster the Resilience of Foreign Infrastructure on Which the U.S. Depends
Interconnected Critical Infrastructure Graphic
Recognizing that much of U.S. critical infrastructure interconnects and/or is interdependent with foreign assets, systems, or networks, CISA will work closely with domestic and international partners to bolster the security and resilience of the international critical infrastructure on which the U.S. depends. These interconnections and interdependencies span the full range of critical infrastructure sectors: pipelines, telecommunications, and essential supply chains, among others. Malicious cyber actors continue to exploit vulnerabilities across these sectors to target critical infrastructure through ransomware and other cyberattacks. The threat from global terrorism remains a persistent concern and a significant threat to U.S. and international facilities. Thus, it is essential for CISA to work with partners to assess and reduce risk from foreign critical dependencies impacting U.S. critical infrastructure resilience. In doing so, CISA must strengthen exchanges with international partners that promote our priorities abroad as well as influence standards, regulations, and policies to advance homeland and national security objectives. A collaborative approach to understanding interconnected critical infrastructure systems will set conditions for the U.S. and our international partners to proactively develop strategies, policies, and programs that integrate risk reduction efforts and reflect mutual and multi-stakeholder security interests at home and abroad.
1.1. Identify and prioritize foreign critical infrastructure on which the nation depends and bolster its security and resilience.
The U.S. depends on foreign-owned systems that support our critical infrastructure sectors such as communications, transportation, information technology, energy, financial services, and critical manufacturing. CISA will work with interagency and international partners to identify and understand which international systems and assets are truly critical to the nation’s critical infrastructure and assess how they are vulnerable to create strategies to manage shared risks. CISA will also work with interagency and international partners to promote a shared understanding of global threats to critical infrastructure security and resilience, such as cyberattacks, chemical and improvised explosive devices, threats to supply chain interdependencies, foreign malign investments, and climate change. Managing risk and bolstering resilience will require long-term, strategic collaboration between public and private sectors at home and abroad.
Enabling Measure: In coordination with the Department of State and relevant U.S. government partners, we will broaden our understanding of systemic risk by expanding our visibility into infrastructure and supply chain vulnerabilities for priority foreign critical infrastructure upon which the U.S. depends.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the number of U.S. government activities coordinated by CISA to advance the security and resilience of prioritized foreign critical infrastructure and supply chains.
2. Increase the number of global partner actions taken to address risks to prioritized foreign critical infrastructure.
3. Increase the number of domestic partner actions taken to mitigate potential disruptions of U.S. critical infrastructure operations resulting from dependencies with foreign assets, systems, and supply chains.
1.2. Strengthen international partnerships that promote U.S. critical infrastructure priorities and interests abroad.
CISA seeks to expand visibility into internationally shared threats and systemic risks. To improve situational awareness for both CISA and our international stakeholders, we must mature multidirectional communications with external partners, including timely incident reporting and the systematic sharing of threat and vulnerability information. Strengthening includes accelerating the speed, improving the accuracy, and enabling the effectiveness of critical information sharing, while using CISA as a hub for multi-stakeholder initiatives. We will use CISA’s cross-functional expertise to foster communication and information sharing with global partners at scale, which will advance the resiliency of our critical infrastructure against shared challenges and preserve our ability to communicate in the event of an emergency. This will create a foundation for advancing international efforts that mature our collective ability to plan for, detect, deter, and disrupt emerging threats and hazards to cyber and physical infrastructure and interoperable emergency communications. Deepening the understanding of shared and systemic risk with our partners will strengthen the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure on which the nation relies.
Enabling Measure: We will expand our ability to execute joint operational activities, capacity development efforts, and shared policy frameworks that advance U.S. priorities for defending cyberspace and protecting U.S. critical infrastructure.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the number of joint operational activities conducted with global partners to build public and private capacity to deter, prevent, protect, and respond to incidents to critical infrastructure.
2. Increase information sharing exchanges with global partners to promote U.S. security and resilience priorities and to enhance CISA’s programs, services, and products.
1.3. Shape operational and technical global standards, regulations, policies, guidelines, and best practices to advance security.
CISA will work with interagency partners to support standards activities—in coordination with the DHS Science and Technology Directorate—through standard development organizations that can advance U.S. interests. Within CISA’s authorities, our aim is to promote and support a wide array of portfolios, including but not limited to cyber and physical critical infrastructure, emerging technology, chemical security, emergency communications, school safety, bombing prevention, and more to ensure that systems, infrastructure, government, business, and the public can withstand and recover from deliberate attacks, accidents, and natural hazards. Where appropriate, we will advance and contribute to the development and adoption of operational and technical international standards and regulations to strengthen cybersecurity, fortify critical infrastructure security and resilience, and improve emergency communication. CISA holds a shared approach to international standards, regulations, guidelines, and best practices for critical infrastructure security and critical emerging technologies, to include artificial intelligence (AI). This will help accelerate standards that contribute to interoperability and promote U.S. competitiveness and innovation with our partners.
Enabling Measure:
1. We will advance open, transparent, and rules-based standards processes to ensure that globally relevant standards meet U.S. national security requirements for critical infrastructure.
2. We will work with partners to counter the influence of adversaries attempting to unduly shape standards in a manner which would represent a threat to national security.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. In coordination with government, industry, and academic partners, increase the development and publication of technical standards for adoption by international standards and policy setting bodies that advance the protection, interoperability, and resilience of U.S. critical infrastructure.
Goal 2: Strengthen Integrated Cyber Defense
Integrated Cyber Defense graphic
Cybersecurity threats extend beyond national borders. Strong international cyber defense partnerships set conditions that reduce risk and minimize the impact of attempts to infiltrate, exploit, disrupt, or destroy critical infrastructure systems that support our national critical functions (NCFs). Engaging international partners allows CISA to build trust, illuminate threats, and facilitate the free flow of cybersecurity defense information. We will work with partners, international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations to influence global cybersecurity practices and standards that promulgate cyber safety and security at scale. Bolstering the capabilities of key partners improves our collective cyber defense abroad against state and non-state actors.
2.1. Enable cyber defense with partners to reduce collective risk.
International partners contribute essential information to support CISA’s cybersecurity mission. A network of trusted partners provides increased visibility into—and ability to mitigate—cybersecurity threats, vulnerabilities, and campaigns. Our aim is to increase and mature our network of trusted partners through our bilateral and multilateral Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT)-CSIRT engagements. Through these engagements, we seek to strengthen CSIRT-CSIRT relationships that enable the exchange of actionable operational information, which includes product sharing, vulnerability alerts, victim notifications, tactics, techniques, and procedures as well as evaluating unique international inputs to reduce risk. This effort will facilitate a collective response and provide a vehicle for partners to share information that builds trust and global cyber situational awareness—especially for those foreign systems, networks, and assets truly vital to the nation’s critical infrastructure. We will strive to set an example as the premier CSIRT organization and work with international partners to understand how incidents occur, how to prevent them, and to provide technical resources that alleviate critical operational gaps. Beyond immediate threat information, these operational partnerships help inform international exercises that will enable us to better understand risks and provide additional ways and means to better manage threats and risk abroad.
Enabling Measure: We will increase trust and strengthen operational collaboration through bilateral and multilateral engagements with international partners by expanding participation in CSIRT-CSIRT engagements.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the number of trusted international CSIRT partners.
2. Increase the percent of bilateral and multilateral CSIRT engagements that reduce combined risk.
3. Increase the number of CSIRT partners that apply recommended risk mitigations prior to exploitation.
2.2. Drive standards and security at scale to increase cyber safety.
For decades, the U.S. has worked through international institutions to define and advance responsible state behavior in cyberspace, steering partners toward developing secure technology from inception. As part of the broader national effort, CISA will encourage international partners to define, adopt, and implement global cybersecurity standards, norms, and best practices that promote U.S. cybersecurity interests. The agency will also provide guidance, advice, and expertise to help define and implement safe global standards, norms, and best practices that support U.S. domestic cybersecurity interests. Our aim is to set the bar high for global standards and prioritize them to reflect CISA interests and implement them as a critical element to protect citizens. As some of the most visible examples, CISA’s international focus is to encourage the widespread adoption of Secure by Design practices, including adoption of software bills of materials, secure AI systems, open-source security, and coordinated vulnerability disclosures.
Enabling Measure: In collaboration with international public and private sector partners, we will advance a global commitment to safe and secure software development and deployment.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase in international standards that recommend frameworks for secure software development at the onset of the software development lifecycle.
2. Increase the number of partner states, international organizations, and industries that adopt and implement the principles of Secure by Design.
2.3. Increase cyber and physical resilience capabilities of key partners.
The breadth and depth of the international cybersecurity challenge exceeds the capacity of any one organization. It is paramount that key partners possess the fundamental capabilities to safeguard and defend their connected critical infrastructure that impact our NCFs. Our aim is to establish an environment where our partners can organically detect threats, assess potential impacts, and receive and exchange real-time risk reduction actions that increase collective security and resilience and support the rapid establishment of consistent, secure, and effective interoperable emergency communications. CISA possesses capabilities that can uniquely contribute to homeland and national security objectives—especially as part of larger U.S. government efforts to improve the cybersecurity capabilities of priority international partners. As the U.S. strengthens relationships with key partners, CISA can provide training, exercises, and information sharing capabilities. These activities can assist international partners in developing and growing organic risk reduction capabilities, while setting supporting priorities for the investment and divestment of limited resources to fill collective capability shortfalls.
Enabling Measure: In collaboration with the Department of State, we will advance shared cybersecurity priorities and strengthen international partner capacity to support these priorities through the focused delivery of CISA services that proactively and collaboratively bolster our international cybersecurity and resilience.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the number of CISA services delivered to international partners that address identified security and resilience gaps.
2. Increase in the percent of program participants equipped with required competencies in cyber or physical security and resilience.
3. Expand the network of foreign train-the-trainer partners capable and approved to provide CISA-based training within their regions.
4. Increase the percent of partners reporting strengthened capabilities to manage their own risk.
Goal 3: Unify Agency Coordination of International Activities
Connecting lines
An effective international plan depends on unity of effort across the agency’s divisions and mission enabling offices (offices). Accomplishing unity of effort will require that CISA internally prioritizes, coordinates, deconflicts, and aligns international activities through improved organization and governance, integrated functions, and a well-trained workforce.
3.1. Strengthen and institutionalize CISA’s governance of international activities.
The CISA Stakeholder Engagement Division (SED) will establish a governance structure to advise on international matters and provide a clear articulation of the agency’s international priorities. Taking into account inputs from divisions and offices, these priorities will provide clear guidance that is consistent with CISA’s authorities and domestic requirements as well as broader DHS and national security policies.
Enabling Measure: We will establish internal agency processes and procedures for governing the agency’s international activities using the One CISA approach.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the number of governance documents and processes that improve standardization and transparency of agency international activities.
3.2. Align and synchronize CISA’s international functions, capabilities, and resources.
CISA will support systematic information sharing across the agency through policy coordination and the collection and dissemination of international lessons learned to effectively realize the full range of specialized expertise and capabilities across the agency. SED will coordinate CISA’s international communications and activities across CISA to provide the agency with situational awareness of current and projected international activities. This coordination will address gaps and eliminate duplication of effort while ensuring timely execution of operational priorities and alignment of CISA’s international activities with this strategic plan and national security priorities.
Enabling Measure: We will optimize internal business operations to ensure the coordinated delivery of products and services to international partners that effectively advance cyberspace defense and U.S. critical infrastructure security and resilience.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the percent of cross-cutting activities coordinated through CISA International Affairs.
2. Increase in internal products and services that improve widespread awareness of key international cybersecurity and critical infrastructure security and resilience issues.
3.3. Equip CISA’s workforce through training and education to promote CISA’s capabilities on the global stage.
With an inherent domestic focus, we recognize that there are skills CISA needs to provide the workforce to influence the international system. CISA will develop and provide training opportunities for employees who will deploy overseas as well as those engaged in deliberate international activities. SED will aim to facilitate DHS and State Department pre-deployment training for Attachés, Liaison Officers, and Technical Advisors deploying overseas, including a CISA familiarization program to ensure a baseline understanding of CISA’s organization, role, responsibilities, authorities, and strategic objectives. SED will provide international affairs etiquette guidance to all travelers as part of the travel preparation process. For CISA leadership and travelers conducting potentially sensitive engagements, SED will provide a tailored pre-departure briefing encompassing cultural norms and U.S. foreign policy goals with recommended talking points.
Enabling Measure: CISA, through its workforce, is prepared to actively and effectively engage in international efforts to advance cyberspace defense, safe and secure technology development and deployment, and critical infrastructure security and resilience.
Measure of Effectiveness:
1. Increase the percent of CISA personnel trained and provided with resources to deliver international services.
2. Increase in the percent of CISA personnel who report that specialized training improved their capability to represent the agency effectively while performing international activities.
Conclusion
Robust and trusted international partnerships serve as a force multiplier across the spectrum of global competition. Successful partnerships require commitment, dedication, and time to build trust. In coordination with DHS and the State Department, CISA will develop, strengthen, and sustain these relationships. This CISA International Strategic Plan provides a framework to build and maintain an agency posture with international partners to enable the U.S. to compete with and prevail against current and future threats. Importantly, this plan addresses multiple challenges under different conditions and creates the framework to prioritize agency efforts.
These goals position CISA strategically with a posture that reinforces critical partnerships abroad to overcome complex and interconnected challenges. The strategic approach aligns CISA with the broader U.S. government as well as our international partners to enable access, develop capacity, and ensure the flexibility to support national efforts to compete globally against state and non-state actors.
This CISA International Strategic Plan creates opportunities for shared success and is a process, not simply a publication; therefore, CISA will review progress quarterly. Unpredictability in the international security environment, or obstacles to our progress, may drive us to change course. We will remain agile and shift our focus to ensure we are integrating the right people, processes, technology, and partners at the right time, place, and space for mission success. Just as our threats and adversaries adapt to and shape the cyber and physical security environment, CISA will continue to evolve to fulfill the vision of a secure and resilient infrastructure for the American people—this CISA International Strategic Plan establishes a proactive path to achieve that vision.

Hybrid threats: Council paves the way for deploying Hybrid Rapid Response Teams

The European Council has approved the guiding framework for the practical establishment of the EU Hybrid Rapid Response Teams. This paves the way for such teams to be deployed upon request, to prepare against and counter hybrid threats and campaigns.
Hybrid Rapid Response Teams are one of the key instruments to support EU member states and partner countries in countering hybrid threats as part of the EU Hybrid Toolbox. As one of the key deliverables of the Strategic Compass, they will provide tailored and targeted short-term assistance to member states, Common Security and Defence Policy missions and operations, and partner countries in countering hybrid threats and campaigns.
In a deteriorating security environment, with increasing disinformation, cyber-attacks, attacks on critical infrastructure, instrumentalised migration, and election interference by malign actors, the Hybrid Rapid Response Teams will be an important new capability of the EU to counter new and emerging threats.

Your latest issue of Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News has arrived

Download your copy now at www.cip-association.org/CIPRNews
Please find here your downloadable copy of the Spring 2024 issue of Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News, the official magazine of the International Association of CIP Professionals (IACIPP), for the latest views, features and news, including a Review of the recent Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience North America conference and exhibition in Lake Charles, LA.
Critical Infrastructure Protection & Resilience News in this issue:
- Protecting Life - Securing Agriculture
- Protect our Electric Grid – Before it’s Too Late
- Connecting Unrelated Industries Strengthens All Sectors
- Why Airspace Awareness Matters for Critical Infrastructure Security
- Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Are we addressing the real challenges? In the right way?
- Break down cyber and physical security silos to improve protection and operations
- An Interview with CITGO
- Is Cybersecurity As Enchanted as Sleeping Beauty?
- CIPRE Review
- Agency News
- Industry News
Download your copy at www.cip-association.org/CIPRNews
1 2 3 9